Welfare Cost in the Government is Running out of Control Research Paper

Welfare Cost in the Government is trial break of Control - Research Paper ExampleCosts of different commodities are raceway out of control while the Medicare is unfairly limiting options for almost every the Statesn. The name of scantness still lingers in the minds of many (June & Mark, 2004). This is because, the poverty is tragic and is as rampant as it was at the onset of the fight against poverty and public assistance programs in the outset of 1960s. The history of the American benefit is intriguing as the Congress and different policy makers can take divergent paths. The Fantasy path, which opines that Medicare and Social Security can survive up to now without structural reforms, the Welfare Empire, has no problems even upon keeping over fifty million Americans in dire poverty, and there is nothing wrong (Marx, 2004). However, this paper intends to show that the follow of welfare in politics is running out of control and the only way to end this problem is through dive rgent convey that it will highlight. Today, the level of poverty in America is high, the approach of medical health is expensive, and overly the cost of living is becoming exorbitant. With reference to Austerity path, the concerned officials tend to turn a blind marrow on these issues and concede that, the best days of American life are over, then cuts rations care, attests that things like additive change are not enough and cannot meet the existing ch everyenges (David, 2010). Additionally, the radically divergent paths taken by policymakers result to cut benefits and a Gingrich path of growth and innovation that concedes that poverty will remain to be an inevitably concurrent fact of all American lives (Howard, 2002). Nevertheless, it has come to most peoples minds that, in spite of all the challenges facing Americans today, there exist numerous and radical measures that can save Americans from cash drainage and continuous siphoning of welfare funds (Eric & Glenn 2004). One, i n order to control the cost of welfare in governing from running out of control, the government could slow the growth of welfare, promote personal responsibility, give portions of welfare assistance in form of loans instead of grants, and/or the government and the other concerned agencies could simply do away with the welfare (Mink & Rickie, 2003). Organizations likely to benefit Enacting these measures would backup man a number of organizations of the burden of providing welfare funds to areas that require it. For instance, the government of United States spends lost of dollars in funding welfare run such as medical health, insurance, regimen aid agencies, public utility steering agencies, and many other organizations within the States (Marx, 2004). It is agreeable that, if only America could invest in ending or relinquishing the welfare services, it would save itself a big patronage of responsibility (June & Mark, 2004). Therefore, the Government of the United States of Ameri ca is one of the agencies that would benefit from stopping or easing the welfare services. Findings make it clear that the Government of the United States does not service welfare all by itself. some other agencies facilitate initiation of the welfare funds and they include the US Department of Health, The Treasury Department, Human services Department, and non-governmental organizations such as the World Food Program, The World Health Organization, and the UNEP (Wenli, 2002). Slowing the growth for welfare As indicated in this paper, slowing the growth for welfare will be part of the efficient and reliable measures aimed ensuring that the cost of welfare in government does not run out of control (Eric & Glenn 2004). This is because, as the history of relief and help runs deep in the hearts of fake poor people, slowing the grow