Experiment: The Dumb Jock

There were two groups in their essay. The thoughtfulnessal group was exposed to hints of interdict stereotypes through a questionnaire before the examination while the control was exposed to the negative stereotypes after the test. The questionnaire brought to their trouble the possibility that they may have been presumption special treatment and considerations due to the fact that they are athletes. Somehow, the experiment proved that there is a negative correlation between the exposure of the athletes to negative stereotypes and their consummateance in taking tests.More exposure to negative stereotypes brought lower pull ahead while less exposure to these stereotypes brought higher scores. For the experimental group, it is possible that answering the questionnaire that exposed them to the muted Jock stereotype lowered their self-regard that led them to get low test results. The questionnaire gave them the idea that they are only accepted in the university because of their athletic skills and not because of their schoolman skills.With this kind of thinking, they competency have exerted less move in nswering the questions of the test because they do not debate that they will get a high grade. He might probably think that the societys expectations regarding his test scores wont be high and that he, himself, is led to believe that he is accepted in the university as an athlete kind of than a student. Similar to the placebo effect, the subject immerses himself to the popular belief and concept of a dumb Jock that might have led him to flunk the test unconsciously when he was given the idea through the questionnaire.The dumb Jock stereotype probably started when the people performing well in thletics happened to be less educate because they spend most of their time honing their athletic abilities rather than their mental abilities. Because of this, people expected less from these athletes and these athletes bleed to cling unto mediocrity and expect special considerations because of their situation. I think the athletes, themselves, try to fit their description to the societys norms. This observation came from years of experience in an NCAA school where a large portion of the population is comprised of athletes.Although IVe seen some who perform well n academics and athletics, it cannot be denied that there are lots of student-athletes who refuse to exert more effort into their academics simply because they think it is not expected of them to do so. In my past school, they nave tried to explain to us now there are several kinds ot smarts and that each and every one of us simply has our let fortes. I think that whats important is that they are reminded that they are good students who happen to play for the school and not athletes who are required to study while they play.Not only does this straighten their focus, but they are also given the idea that they are accepted as a student not as an athlete. There were instances wherei n prestigious schools rejected great athletes not because they werent good enough in their field of sports but because they werent able to last the entrance examination. It is important for them to know that they are in their position not entirely because of their athletic bravery but because they are students first and that representing the school comes second.